PRETERIST

Articles, Discussions, Debates, All Things A.D. 70

The Law of Faith in Operation

faith-on-bible

OPERATION of the Law of Faith in action is evidenced throughout the Scriptures in a variety of ways.  The best definition of faith is simply that of, “taking God at His Word.” Sometimes faith seems reasonable–from a human standpoint, in other instances, not so much.  There is no “magic formula” or “sacred incantation” associated with the operation of faith in the lives of God’s dealings with people.

One great Biblical example of the operation of faith is associated with a great Commander of the army of Syria–Naaman who had been victorious in battle with the help of the Lord (II Kings 5:1).  Naaman was afflicted with leprosy–a terrible, disfiguring, skin disease (v. 1) for which there was no known cure at the time.

A “young girl” who is not named in the Scriptures, who had been abducted from the land of Israel, suggested to the wife of the Commander that there was a Prophet of God in Samaria who could heal Naaman of his awful disease (v. 2-4).  A letter was sent from Naaman to the King of Israel regarding the matter and the message reached the ears of Elisha, “the man of God” (v. 5-8), accompanied by expensive gifts from the King of Syria (v. 5).

Naaman, whom the text describes as “a great and exalted man” (v. 1) soon arrived in Samaria with great fanfare with “his horses and his chariot” to be healed by the power of God at the hands of His prophet, Elisha (v. 9) and stood outside the door of his house–waiting (v. 9).  Elisha did not come to the door himself, but instructed his messenger to relate to Naaman what he must do in order to receive his healing:  “…Go, and you wash seven times in the Jordan.  And your flesh shall return to you, and you shall be clean” (II Kings 5:10).  Simple enough instructions from “the man of God,” but not exactly what Naaman was expecting to hear:

“And Naaman was angry, and went on, and said, Behold, I said, He will certainly come out to me and will stand and call on the name of Jehovah his God, and will wave his hand over the place, and recover the leper…And he turned and went on in fury” (II Kings 5:11, 12).

Naaman was apparently expecting a Benny Hinn style crusade experience, waiting for Elisha to perform some kind of mystical ceremony, proclaiming, “this is your day, be healed!” When it did not happen in the way he “thought” (KJV) it should have, he became angry and turned away.  The “great” Commander did not want to bathe himself in the muddy waters of the Jordan river in order to receive his healing from God–it was beneath his dignity (v. 12).  The servants of the Commander reasoned with him, “…if the prophet had bid thee do some great thing, wouldest thou not have done it? how much rather then, when he saith to thee, Wash, and be clean?” (II Kings 5:13).

Naaman just needed to forget his expectations of a “big show” and take God at His Word–follow the instructions of Elisha!  Never mind the lack of “logic” 010509of trying to figure how how taking a bathe in the Jordan river and dipping himself “seven times” would make him whole.  From a human standpoint the instructions made no sense whatsoever–what possible “power” could the water of the Jordan have to make him free and “clean” from his infirmity?  Faith always responds through obedient action in order to produce the desired results (James 2:26).  Jesus told those who came to Him, “According to your faith be it unto you” (Matt. 9:29), and “Thy faith hath made thee whole” (Matt. 9:22).  The obedient action in response to the command of “the man of God” was the dividing line between sickness and disease, heath and healing–no other action or substitution would bring about the desired results.  The choice and final decision belonged to Naaman.

“And he went down and dipped in the Jordan seven times, according to the word of the man of God. And his flesh returned like the flesh of a little boy, and he was clean” (II Kings 5:14).  Amazing are the results that come from faith when acted on in obedience to the Word of God!  In addition to the physical healing aspect of this account is the heart of gratitude that Naaman has for the God of Israel who acted on his behalf:  “And he went back to the man of God, he and all his company, and came in and stood before him, and said, Behold, now I know that there is not a God in all the earth except in Israel” (v. 15).  The faith of Naaman produced a confession of praise and adoration for the God who healed him and from that heart came the offer to share his wealth with “the man of God” (v. 15).  Unlike Benny Hinn and others, Elisha refused to accept any gift that might resemble “payment for services rendered” and sent Naaman on his way rejoicing (v. 16).

LESSONS FOR TODAY

The experience of Naaman should be enough to convince people of the absolute necessity of taking God at His Word.  Whatever does not originate with faith is sin (Rom. 14:23), and “without faith it is impossible to please God. For it is right that the one drawing near to God should believe that He is, and that He becomes a rewarder to the ones seeking Him out” (Heb. 11:6).  Faith begins and ends where the Word begins and ends.  Those who stand upon the firm foundation of Biblical authority for “all things pertaining to life and godliness through the full knowledge of the One calling us through glory and virtue” (II Pet. 1:3) soon become the blessed recipients of “the very great and precious promises, so that through these you might be partakers of the divine nature” (II Pet. 1:4).  It is impossible to do the one without receiving the other.  The promises of God are the basis upon which the blessings of God either stand or fall.  Failure to receive the promised blessing is as much a matter of choice today as was the case in the instance of Naaman during the time of Elisha.

The rise of newfound “ministries” devoted to the refutation of Completed Redemption (Preterism) find themselves standing alone at the shores of the muddy waters of the Jordan river.  Those once filled with the sense of joyful celebration in the accomplished work of God through Christ have now returned to the place of their former darkness–the systematic confusion of modern-day Futurism.  The former believers (NAMES UPON REQUEST) have unwittingly set themselves in opposition to the very integrity of the Word of God while clinging endlessly to humanly devised “fables” in the form of Creeds, Confessions and Councils–none of which are authoritative as is “the gospel of Christ, for it is the power of God to salvation to everyone believing” (Rom. 1:16).  Like those left behind their convictions during the first century, “For if by a recognition of the Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, they have escaped the defilements of the world, and again being entangled they have been overcome by these, then their last things have become worse than the first.  For it was better for them not to have recognized the way of righteousness than having recognized it to turn from the holy commandment delivered to them. But the word of the true proverb has happened to them: “The dog turning to his own vomit;” also, the washed sow to wallowing in mud” (II Pet. 2:20-22).  Each of these false teachers will, at the end of their journey in this realm of existence, be required, individually to “give account concerning himself to God” (Rom. 14:12).  The fact of the eschatological judgment in 70 C.E. does not absolve one for his individual and personal accountability before the Lord.  There is no “free-pass” for those who willingly “speak perverted things, in order to draw away the disciples after themselves” (Acts 20:30).

Those casting reproach on the reality of Completed Redemption through the use of terms such as Hyper-Preterism have taken a stand alongside all those other Futurists whose only hope is in the meaningless mantra of “wait and see”–more of the same.  Premillennial, Amillennial, Post-millennial, or even PAN-millennial (believing it will all someday “pan out” in the end) have nothing of lasting value to say other than more “postponement” or “non-occurrence of the Parousia”–the words of “liberal” scholarship who deny the authenticity and authority of the Word of God.  A sad company in which to find oneself, indeed!

The Law of Faith must now–more than at any other time in human history–cause men and women to rise up and be counted for the cause of Completed Redemption.  Those who would now announce to the world the message of the established Kingdom of God must step forward and sow seeds of faith into the spreading of this message as never before seen.  The admonition of Solomon rings true:  “Send out your bread on the face of the waters, for you shall find it in many days…Sow your seed in the morning, and do not rest your hand until evening; for you do not know what shall be blessed, this or that; or whether they both shall be good as one” (Eccl. 11:1, 6).  God will bless His people and those who remain faithful to His message with an abundant harvest of “good things” (Psa. 103:5).

The message of “hope deferred” must be erased from the minds of 21st century believers (Prov. 13:12).  The churches who have compromised with the “social gospel” and who have forsaken the “preaching of the cross” (I Cor. 1:18) for some other message less offensive have abandoned “the faith which was once for all time delivered to the saints” (Jude 3).  The power of the gospel and the message of the Cross depends upon one’s acceptance of the fulfillment of all that was promised in the Scriptures–that which occurred in the first century C.E. with those events associated with the destruction of the temple and the establishment of the “everlasting covenant” with God’s people (Heb. 13:20).

victory2Debates over the “finer” points of Completed Redemption–issues such as the individual vs. collective viewpoint, “rapture” theories, and “Covenant Creation” must be set aside for another place at another time.  The Futurist scheme of “divide and conquer” cannot be allowed to prevail.  The basic points of agreement regarding the fact, time, manner, and purpose of the Lord’s coming must be shouted from the housetops as never before.  A new spirit of humility toward the Word of God must rise from deep within the hearts of God’s children accompanied by an uncompromising attitude toward all those who would call into question those basic principles upon which Completed Redemption rests.  “For all those things hath mine hand made, and all those things have been, saith the LORD: but to this man will I look, even to him that is poor and of a contrite spirit, and trembleth at my word” (Isa. 66:2).

Like Naaman of old, all preconceptions about what one “thinks” should or should not have happened must be discarded, faith and obedience are now the order of the day.  “Seven times” into the muddy waters of the Jordan we go, ever onward in our stand for the truth and righteousness, “for today the LORD has accomplished salvation in Israel” (I Sam. 11:13).

Happy New Year!

January 6, 2009 - Posted by mellentos | Daily Word | | 16 Comments

16 Comments »

  1. Amen, Larry!

    Comment by sam | January 6, 2009

  2. Well written… well said.
    We serve a Risen and Victorious Lord who did WHAT He said He would do WHEN He said He would do it!
    We must form our beliefs out of what the Scriptures say rather than the other way around.
    God said it, that settles it, I believe it!

    Comment by Laurie | January 6, 2009

  3. yes yes, it is time to circle the wagons!

    Comment by kent | January 7, 2009

  4. Laurie,

    There are lots of things God said He would do “soon,” that He subsequently put off doing. If the “soon” coming of Christ, resurrection, and judgment were contingent on certain conditions, and if those conditions were not met, then there couldn’t have been any first-century accomplishment. The Bible clearly states that the second coming is conditional upon Israel’s repentance (Acts 3: 19-21; Matt. 23: 39; Hosea 5: 15). Because the conditions was not met within the 40 years of probation allotted to Israel, the temple was destroyed, the nation dispersed, and the second coming postponed to a future time.

    Christ never came back in A.D. 70, and Preterists will never prove that He did, because their theory relies on “subjective” (i.e., unverifiable) view of prophetic fulfullment.

    Brian

    Comment by Brian Simmons | January 7, 2009

  5. BTW, Larry, it’s interesting how you hold to a Futurist soteriology that is completely out of keeping with your views of “past fulfillment.” Consistent Full Preterism holds that all men are now saved by default, because the elements of the Old Testament system were completely (consistently) dissolved at the destruction of the Jewish temple.

    Brian

    Comment by Brian Simmons | January 7, 2009

  6. Brian
    Good to hear from you! IF Preterists actually believed what you THINK they believe I would not blame you for leaving it behind in a second.

    Salvation is (never has been) the “default” position. Salvation is a “Faith-based” proposition (Heb. 11:6). Salvation is about Covenant relationship and a person MUST first enter INTO that Covenant relationship in order to be saved. This is what the book of Revelation is talking about when it describes the City of God with “gates” (which means there are some INSIDE and there are some OUTSIDE).

    Futurists who say Revelation 21-22 are about “heaven” or a “rennovated new earth” have to deal with the fact that “nations” exist OUTSIDE the City of God and that INSIDE that City of God is where the “trees” of life are WHY? For the “healing of the nations” BUT, “outside are the dogs…etc”

    People entered INTO the Old Covenant with God, and people enter INTO the New Covenant with God and it is all about exercising faith in the appropriated benefits of the shed blood of Jesus Christ and all that He accomplished on the Cross. Glory to God!

    Comment by mellentos | January 7, 2009

  7. Larry,

    You write: “Salvation is about Covenant relationship and a person MUST first enter INTO that Covenant relationship in order to be saved.”

    Enter into it from where, Larry?? If we’re not in the New, we’re under the Old. The Bible does not teach any covenantal “limbo land.” In order for there to be any “need” to enter the New, the Old must still be in effect. But by teaching that the Old passed away in A.D. 70, the conclusion is that all men are in the new by default.

    But you write: “Salvation is (never has been) the “default” position.”

    Is condemnation a default position?? Please give me a straight yes or no answer? Also, are all men born into the world as “sinners?” The definition of sin is “transgression of the law” (1 John 3: 4), which you claim “passed away” in A.D. 70.

    So I guess salvation is the default position!

    Remember, this is not MY eschatology, but yours.

    Brian

    Comment by Brian Simmons | January 7, 2009

  8. Brian
    Regarding your earlier comment about “subjective” verification. Given your present stance (Premillennialism), do you believe that the establishment of the state of Israel in 1948 is the fulfillment of Bible prophecy? If so, how would you “verify” this fact? (secular history, maybe?)

    Regarding your other comments:

    *** The Greek text literally reads, “sin is lawlessness” (not a specific reference to the Old Covenant system in particular). Even Paul affirmed that in ministering to those “without law” (Gentiles) he became as one “without law” (identified with them), all the while being “under law” to Christ (I Cor. 9:20-22). Although the Old Covenant “law of Moses” (Mediator) had no power to save (based upon the shedding of the blood of bulls and goats), the New Covenant “law of Christ” (Mediator) was able to to accomplished what the Old Covenant never could–actual remission of sins.

    Jesus said unbelievers were “condemned already” by virtue of their unbelief (John 3:18). “All have sinned” (Rom. 3:23). apart from entrance INTO the New Covenant THROUGH faith, one stands “condemned” before God.

    The Scriptures DO teach that some “sinned” BEFORE and WITHOUT the Old Covenant law (Gentiles) and were guilty before God, even as also were the Jews who had the law of Moses and the Old Covenant system.

    What Preterists claim is that the POWER of sin and death has been broken and that people who “believe” are declared righteous before God based upon the shed blood of Christ. Because some are not under the New Covenant does not necessarily imply that the Old Covenant remains in force today…There is no logical reason to draw that conclusion.

    The arrivial of the New Heavens and New Earth signifies a change in rulership and administration. It is the City of God (New Jerusalem) that represents the restored relationship with God and their eternal dwelling place in His presence.

    There is and never has been a “limbo” status for fallen humanity. Even Hades represented a state of separation from God for BOTH the “righteous” (who could not enter into “heaven itself” during that time) or for the “unrighteous” who were already experiencing eschatological “torment” or “condemnation” because of sin.

    Your question about the “default” position is also affected by how one views the matter of “election” In your view (Calvinism) Preterist or not, the choice from the foundation of the world has already been made and therefore, there is no “default” position–sone “elected” to salvation, others to “damnation.” From the standpoint of a more (Arminian) stance, the issue of individual choice of acceptance or rejection of the gospel determines the end result and thus again, there is no “default” position.

    Some believe babies are born “totally depraved” while others believe one BECOMES a “sinner” when there is actual knowledge of sin and therefore babies are “safe” before God and none are lost eternally. Some of this has nothing whatsoever to do with eschatology but rather soteriology, although there is certainly a relationship.

    I do not believe that New Covenant believers are “lawless” today although under the power of grace. The New Covenant has boundaries.

    Larry

    Comment by mellentos | January 7, 2009

  9. Larry,

    In Hebrews 9: 15, Paul writes that Christ “is the MEDIATOR of the new testament, that by means of death, for the redemption of the transgressions that were under the FIRST TESTAMENT, they which are called might receive the promise of eternal inheritance.”

    If the First Testament is passed away, then where is the mediation?? The Gentiles were condemned by the law, just as the Jews were. “Now we know that whatsoever things the law saith, it saith to them who are under the law: that every mouth may be stopped, and the WHOLE WORLD become guilty before God” (Romans 3: 19).

    Also: “I had not known sin, but by the law. For I had not known lust, except the law had said, THOU SHALT NOT COVET” (Romans 7: 7).

    Here’s another one: “For the sting of death is sin, and the strength of sin is the law” (1 Cor. 15: 56).

    And another: “where no law is, there is no transgression” (Romans 4: 15). And “sin is not imputed where there is no law” (Romans 5: 13).

    Nevertheless, “Death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similtitude of Adam’s transgression” (Romans 5: 14).

    If sin isn’t transgression of the moral law, then how can sin obtain strength through the law?? And if the law was universally taken away in A.D. 70, then doesn’t that imply that sin has no more power over “all men”??

    Brian

    Comment by Brian Simmons | January 8, 2009

  10. Larry,

    In answer to your your other question, yes, I believe the establishment of Israel in 1948 was the fulfillment of Bible prophecy. How do I verify this? Easy.

    When Jesus cursed the fig-tree, He said, “Let no man eat fruit of thee hereafter FOR THE AGE (eis ton aiona” (Mark 11: 13).

    Then in His Olivet Discourse, Christ gave the signs relative to the end of the “AGE.”

    “Now learn a parable of the fig tree; when her branch is yet tender, and putteth forth leaves, ye know that summer is near: so ye, in like manner, when ye shall see these things come to pass, know that it is nigh, even at the doors.”

    That is, when Israel shows signs of national revival, the end of the age is nigh.

    “Verily I say unto you, that THIS GENERATION (Israel) shall not pass, till all these things be done” (v. 30).

    That is, the Jewish nation will not be destroyed until God’s purposes concerning them are fulfilled. Compare with Jer. 30: 11.

    “Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my word shall not pass away.”

    That is, He will maintain His promise to Israel, in accordance with Jeremiah 31: 35-37.

    Brian

    Comment by Brian Simmons | January 8, 2009

  11. Larry,

    Let me throw fifteen major concepts with 50 Scriptures and thirteen questions to you, and if you can’t answer them in rapid fire, then your view is false. Sheesh

    I have to say that Brian is losing credibility with me. Premillennialism has long, long been dropped, even by the Reformed. I won’t dance that dance anymore.

    sam

    Comment by sam | January 8, 2009

  12. I have a question for Brian:

    If God promised to bring Israel into that strip of land over there “forever” then how does he explain “the heavens and the earth were no more”? Wouldn’t the new earth require new dirt?

    Comment by sam | January 8, 2009

  13. Sam,

    Huh?? Pre-Millenniallism is the faith of at least 90% of the Christian church! Where have been all this time? Also, I’m not Reformed, so I could care less about what they think. I’m a Southern Baptist.

    Brian

    Comment by Brian Simmons | January 9, 2009

  14. Brian,

    Have you polled the entire Christian Church to check that accuracy? It may be 90% of the Baptist church, great..but there are more Christians than just the Baptists…

    And, please, answer my follow up question.

    Sam

    Comment by sam | January 9, 2009

  15. I have to say that Brian is losing credibility with me. Premillennialism has long, long been dropped, even by the Reformed. I won’t dance that dance anymore.

    I’ve only been reading here for a short time, and he has already lost all credibility with me. He’s seems to be Scripturally ignorant and just whips thing around and out of context at will.

    For example he stated:

    The Gentiles were condemned by the law, just as the Jews were. “Now we know that whatsoever things the law saith, it saith to them who are under the law: that every mouth may be stopped, and the WHOLE WORLD become guilty before God” (Romans 3: 19)”

    “The Gentiles were condemned by the law” Huh??????? Where exactly do you get that from???

    Paul states in Romans 2:12 For all who have sinned without the law will also perish without the law, and all who have sinned under the law will be judged by the law.

    Now we know that whatsoever things the law saith, it saith to them who are under the law: that every mouth may be stopped, and the WHOLE WORLD become guilty before God” (Romans 3: 19)”

    The Gentiles was already condemned.
    Eph. 2:12 “remember that you were at that time separated from Christ,alienated from the commonwealth of Israel and strangers to the covenants of promise, having no hope and without God in the world.”

    Also:

    Romans 5: “12 Therefore, just as sin came into the world through one man, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men (both Jew and Gentile) because all sinned— 13 for sin indeed was in the world before the law was given, but sin is not counted where there is no law. 14 Yet death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over those [Jew and Gentile prior to the law] whose sinning was not like the transgression of Adam, who was a type of the one who was to come.”

    The Gentile’s (and Jews for that matter) sins were not counted against them prior to the giving of the Law. But, “the death” nevertheless was reigning over the Gentile (and the Jews too). Thus, they were always in “death”, both prior and after the giving of the law.

    The law was given to Israel and Israel only! It was Israel who thought that because they were in covenant with God that they were not in “death”. Paul’s point is the law spoke to Israel, and thus shut their mouth too right along with the Gentile! Thus, the adding of Israel to the Gentiles = the WHOLE WORLD.

    It is Brian’s kind of pathetic attempts at interpreting Scripture that has the Church in the mess it’s in today.

    Rich

    Comment by Rich | January 9, 2009

  16. Rich,

    Abraham was a Gentile. What do you suppose Paul meant when he said that Abraham was “justified” by faith? From what law was he justified?? It must have been the moral law, which is written in the hearts of all men (Romans 2: 12). The law wasn’t written in stone until the Sinaitic covenant with Israel.

    Brian

    Comment by Brian Simmons | January 28, 2009


Leave a comment